Adablog01MayNations
Delen
This page is dedicated to support Queen May yul Edochie . May is a perfect example of when life gives you a lemon, you make lemonade.
A symbol of resilience for many women intentionally place by men in unfavorable position but who pull stronger than ever.
14/09/2026
27th July 2026 New world legal submitted petition to the NBA, copied the secretary of the supremecourt, LPDC against Emeka of DPA .
This angered Mr disbarred, he resulted into cyber attacks, lies and blackmails.
Which of course did not work because I do not back down when I set a goal before me.
Unknown to us, Mr DPA also submitted a new application to be reinstated as a lawyer.
Breaking News! guys, I am please to inform you all that the Asabe Waziri Justice Advocacy Initiative updated its LPDC on 30 July 2026.
The LDPC considered Chukwuemeka Ephraim Ugwuonye’s of DPA application to have his name restored to the Roll, and found that he had not established sufficient grounds—including sufficient evidence of remorse and rehabilitation—and struck out the application.
I have requested the official LPDC/NBA/Supreme Court database. When I receive it, it will be posted.
Oga DPA, Continue disturbing the internet and constituting nuisance , I am piling up your file. The next is to proof that you acted in the capacity of a lawyer while in New York.
ujuofficialpageAmaranne Tv EpicAproko Bus driverMaynation SupremeCourtPatience Blogs BackupLa.reine.MYEReal Oil and gas TVs.j family tvPatience Vlogs TV
14/09/2026
Hello everyone,
Someone inbox me this publication.
Real quick, here is my opinion and advice.
BLOGGERS, BEFORE YOU START PANICKING — COME AND LEARN SMALL LAW.
So DPA International Foundation has now discovered a new method of service: post your letter on Facebook and announce that everybody has been “deemed served.” 😄
Please, there is a difference between publishing a letter and effecting legally recognised service of court process.
Where Nigerian procedural law requires personal service and you cannot locate the person, you ordinarily approach the court for an order of substituted service. It is the court that authorises the alternative method. You don’t sit in your organisation, type “METHOD OF SERVICE — SERVICE BY PUBLICATION”, post it on Facebook and confer judicial authority upon yourself. A page is not a court registry.
And there is another elephant sitting comfortably in this room. 🐘
If the person behind this is struck off the Nigerian Roll of Legal Practitioners, geographical distance does not restore the licence. In Okafor v Nweke, the Supreme Court made the position clear: without your name on the Roll, you cannot engage in legal practice in Nigeria.
So please distinguish two things:
You are free to write a letter. You are free to post your letter. But whether you are legally entitled to act as a lawyer, and whether your Facebook publication constitutes valid legal service, are completely different questions.
My advice to any blogger named in such a publication? Don’t panic and don’t delete anything. Screenshot it. Preserve the post. Ask for the suit number, originating process and, where substituted service is claimed, the COURT ORDER authorising service by that method.
Because in law, writing “YOU HAVE BEEN SERVED” in capital letters does not make it so. 😂⚖️
I will be back in a minute to drop the breaking News on Emeka new application to the bar in July 2026.
Mr DPA, I have compiled your atrocities online, well documented. You can never be back on the roll of lawyers in Nigeria. I guarantee you that.
You will always hide behind that ugly mask (DPA) because you are a danger to the nation.
We learn law here. We don’t manufacture it.
ujuofficialpageAproko Bus driverAmaranne Tv EpicMaynation SupremeCourtPatience Blogs BackupLa.reine.MYEReal Oil and gas TVs.j family tvPatience Vlogs TV
The order is unusually explicit. It commands him to refrain from practising law “in any form in the State of New York” and forbids him from giving another person “an opinion as to the law or its application,” giving legal advice, or holding himself out as an attorney in New York.
And New York Judiciary Law § 486 provides that a disbarred person who performs acts reserved to persons regularly admitted to practise law can be guilty of a misdemeanor.
So, for example, if he were sitting in New York and livestreaming as usual giving legal advise or opinion or protesting himself as a lawyer.
Anyone can alert and report him to the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, the body that brought the proceeding resulting in his disbarment.
Class is dismissed, we start the week by update on the bigamy case, Yul and Judy have honored their invites also signed their statement.
The police concludes their report two weeks from now.
Have a great week ahead.
I rise.
13/09/2026
Alright.
Let decipher the court document:
On 27 October 2022, the New York Appellate Division disbarred Ephraim Chukwuemeka Ugwuonye, struck his name from New York’s roll of attorneys, prohibited him from practising law in any form in New York, and expressly forbade him from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counsellor-at-law in New York.
The judgment also records that he had already been disbarred in the District of Columbia (2019), Maryland (2019) and the U.S. Tax Court (2019), and notes that his name had been struck from the Nigerian roll in 2018 following a finding of “infamous conduct.”
What is crucial is in the final “Ordered” paragraph, at line 20 of the published decision.
The court first orders that Ephraim Chukwuemeka Ugwuonye is “disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately.”
The same paragraph then states:
“respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form in the State of New York”
and, crucially, continues that he is forbidden:
“to hold himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State”
The order goes even further. It prohibits him in New York from appearing as an attorney before a court or other public authority, giving another person an opinion on the law or its application, or giving legal advice.
What does it mean for the public,
If Mr DPA is currently residing in the state of New York/USA while he goes online giving opinion on law or its application even giving legal advise he can be reported on Facebook.
Make a copy of this court document, click on report then upload it, facebook will struck that particular video down.
If Emeka is physically in New York and, while there, uses Facebook/YouTube or another online platform to act as a lawyer—such as giving someone legal advice, giving an opinion on how the law applies to their case, or holding himself out as an attorney—that could violate the 2022 New York disbarment order.
It potentially raises two separate issues: breach of the Appellate Division’s disciplinary order and unlawful practice of law by a disbarred attorney.
We have proof of this behaviour and have submitted it to the relevant authority.
Why?
The order is unusually explicit. It commands him to refrain from practising law “in any form in the State of New York” and forbids him from giving another person “an opinion as to the law or its application,” giving legal advice, or holding himself out as an attorney in New York.
And New York Judiciary Law § 486 provides that a disbarred person who performs acts reserved to persons regularly admitted to practise law can be guilty of a misdemeanor.
So, for example, if he were sitting in New York and livestreaming as usual giving legal advise or opinion or protesting himself as a lawyer.
Anyone can alert and report him to the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, the body that brought the proceeding resulting in his disbarment.
Class is dismissed, we start the week by update on the bigamy case, Yul and Judy have honored their invites also signed their statement.
The police concludes their report two weeks from now.
Have a great week ahead.
I rise.
Patience Blogs BackupPatience Vlogs TV Amaranne Tv EpicMaynation SupremeCourtLa.reine.MYEbella oniks2 s.j family tvReal Oil and gas TV
Ok today’s lecture is decipher the court ruling on DPA
13/09/2026
So, let’s test your legal ability to decipher.
Take a quick good look at these document👇🏿👇🏿
Comment what jumps to mind or in your face.
I will be back analyse.
There something critical the court said concerning DPA and that is the key into legally apprehending the loose walking legal rogue on the street of Facebook.
Don’t forget to like, share and follow.
We need a stronger platform to push for legal enforcement. Advocate is one thing but getting what you are advocating for is another.
The power to enforce lay with the people.
Good morning class, after several report, I have decided to introduce a new lecture call “unlocking DPA” class resume today, pls don’t be late
Good morning, everyone who love justice.
I hope you are all having a great day.
I have read the comments, including the emotional reactions, and I have taken your opinions into consideration.
When I analyse a case, advocate for rights, or give legal commentary, if you find something important or valuable, write the point down and discuss it with your lawyer. You can also DM me to request advice or ask for legal assistance.
Every lawyer has their own area of expertise and their own way of studying, analysing and approaching legal documents. What one lawyer considers irrelevant, another lawyer may identify as important. If you find something I raise relevant, take note of it.
But please do not come to my page, DM me, or call me to tell me what I should or should not discuss, or why I should keep my legal opinion private for someone personally.
I am not privately hired. Know the difference.
I am principled in my dealings. I do not go looking for people to advise or attack. I also understand my professional boundaries and what should or should not be said.
The Obasi case is discussed strictly on the basis of what the claimant, Judy, herself placed in the public domain.
May petitioned DPA. The document was posted publicly, and when I read it, I identified something I considered sufficiently important to warrant filing a petition before the NBA concerning his professional conduct.
Sometimes what one lawyer sees through their legal lens may be different from what another lawyer sees.
I speak on substance and on what people themselves choose to place in the public domain. If you do not want the public discussing your case, do not turn it into a public spectacle.
As the saying goes: he who carries ant-infested firewood should not be surprised when lizards come visiting.
Like I have said repeatedly, I am here for the public. I am not here for any blogger or content creator.
Bigamy is not “content.” It is a real legal issue. If your husband marries another woman, or your wife marries another man while still legally married to you, the law exists for a reason. That is what I am advocating for. When we finish with one issue, we move to the next.
My commentary concerning Judy and Yul comes from the substance of what they themselves have placed in the public domain.
So far, the person who appears to have largely minded her own business is May Yul Edochie. She was online for years without turning her private marital affairs into public entertainment.
Her husband and the other woman publicly associated with him brought much of that private situation into the public space, exposing May to public attention. A “Judy Warrior” platform was even created around the controversy, while May was already dealing with the breakdown of her marriage and loss of her child.
May Yul Edochie did not create MayNation.
MayNation developed from people around the world who witnessed what they believed was the unfair treatment of a woman online and collectively said, “No. Enough is enough.”
There is a difference.
Within MayNation, you have May’s actual fans. You also have supporters who support her without identifying as MayNation. And beyond that, a wider movement has developed around what many people believe May represents.
Many women have historically felt pressured into accepting polygamy or situations they never agreed to.
May said NO.
She chose herself and the wellbeing of her children.
That is the category I fall into.
For me, the movement represents women learning to prioritise their self-respect, dignity, mental wellbeing and, most importantly, the wellbeing of their children.
You do not have to remain in a toxic relationship simply “for the children.” Sometimes walking away creates the healthier environment children actually need.
At the same time, children have rights involving both parents. Where appropriate and safe, the other parent should have proper access and continue fulfilling their parental responsibilities.
If you are struggling financially, visit the nearest Legal Aid office or equivalent service in your country. In Nigeria, for example, legal assistance may be available depending on your circumstances.
You can seek legal advice about child maintenance and parental responsibilities whether or not you were married in court. Having a child creates responsibilities toward that child.
I am here to help in whatever way I reasonably can, but most importantly, to educate people about their rights and how the law can be used.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
So we are learning here.
You are welcome to engage in meaningful discussions. Ask questions where you do not understand something. Challenge an argument respectfully. Bring another legal perspective.
I want this page to become a safe space where people can learn and help one another.
Have empathy. Be kind to each other. We learn every day even I am still learning.
And remember: education is not measured only by degrees. A person can hold several certificates and still lack wisdom, awareness or basic respect for others.
Education comes in many forms.
So, for those coming here with negative energy, looking for someone to smear, insult or verbally attack: Facebook is big enough for everybody.
Simply scroll past and find a page that accommodates that behaviour.
But if you bring toxicity here, I will delete it and block you.
There are other platforms where that behaviour is welcomed.
Here, we learn. We question. We advocate. We respect one another — and we use the law to understand our rights.
ujuofficialpageAproko Bus driverAmaranne Tv EpicMaynation SupremeCourtPatience Blogs BackupLa.reine.MYEbella oniks2 s.j family tvPatience Vlogs TV Maynation Diaspora
Ok, for the last time on the questions on amendment.
Not everything in a lawsuit is “just amendable” as though you are correcting WhatsApp typos. Nigerian courts do allow amendments beyond spelling mistakes — even substantial amendments — but only with the court’s permission and where justice requires it.
Under Order 24 of the FCT High Court Civil Procedure Rules 2025, a party seeking a substantive amendment must formally apply, exhibit the proposed changes and highlight them; The court can refuse an amendment that is made in bad faith, overreaches the other party and creates injustice that cannot properly be cured. This is where Mr Obasi lawyers must come with solid argument using the Supreme Court precedent l.
Unless Mr Obasi has lousy lawyers, this case is supposed to be a slam dunk!!!
Tomorrow lecture will be on Ezenwanyii testimony. Becareful when you include yourself as a witness to lie on oath.
Klik hier om uitgelicht te worden.