Beth Minardi Hair Color

FALSE: "Non-Ammonia" permanent hair color is NOT "milder, or "more gentle" than the color containing ammonia as an alkalizer. While the "fragrance" of ammonia is unpleasant, hair color chemists share that the BEST alkalizer in hair color is ammonia, as its action is most consistent and predictable.

As you now the dye precursors, developer (peroxide) and alkalizer present in permanent hair dye, work to gather to create a product that can lighten natural color, match natural color or darken natural color as it covers gray 100 percent. As a salon professional, the product choices, as always are yours.. but, PLEASE understand that "non-ammonia" hair color is not alkaline free! A substitute alkalizer is present in the product.. Without alkalizer, the product would be unable to pe*****te the cortex of the hair or to re-arrange the natural melanin there.... creating the new, desired shade of color.

Join our community! www.Bethminardi-allaccess.com. Elevating salon hair color to an art form. B
As

SITUATION: You see six hair color clients in a day... I'd estimate that only one or two of them require chelation or an "unicolor" service prior to your starting their. hair color application. And, on a good day, no one will need this extra service. Perform it ONLY WHEN YOU NEED TO!

YOU ARE THE EXPERT: When hair is FILTHY, COATED with "too much goo" or seems too "built up" with color, with too much depth or looks like something is "OFF". Go ahead and clarify prior to coloring. However, as you understand, not every single client comes to your chair with this type of "situation". Let's be careful and completely professional.. without making life any more difficult than
it already is. Love, Beth!

Help me rain the human "voice"of salon hair color learning. My on-line" color "class" is yours for FREE when you click "Hair Color Learning Library. Join. Log in, and Enjoy
www.Bethminardi-allaccess.com.

COLOR CRAFT, the new hair color textbook offered by the Board of Certified Hair Colorists is nothing like books offered previously. It is modern, very factual, detailed and backed by science. At $375, the book is expensive, but worth EVERY PENNY! And, when you order, and use the discount code BETH50, you will pay $325 for your copy.

Not a "quick read".. but a detailed way to learn about color. Attending a show costs more than purchasing this book. As always, the decision is yours...and, I rarely, if ever, recommend specific salon texts. If you are interested, contact Marta at: Marta@boardofcertificed hair colorists.com.

https://youtu.be/NiebpPzoJTI?is=zlR6dVVWmATfgPur
How SOFT HIGHLIGHTS beautify a hair cut

Hair Color Tutorial: Beth Minardi On Proper Foiling Beth Minardi demos the proper foiling technique for dimensional hai...

Protect yourself!

https://youtube.com/shorts/UTsoMrxjavM?is=HWOHKm9aRBxm6DFV. Remembering the calm, the beauty and the feeling of security five minutes before everything changed. Every protected moment is a gift.

World Trade Center Before the Planes Hit It was 25 years ago that air travel and world policy changed foreve...

Ok. Let’s look again at important salon words, …. Possessive, singular and plural. Believe it or not, even magazine writers forget to add that ‘s’ at the end when needed!

The word is ‘hairdresser’

One hairdresser is coming to the class. ( singular)
Three hairdressers are coming to the class. ( Plural).

Our Hairdresser’s makeup kit is on her station. ( One hairdresser, singular)

Our hairdressers’ tools are on their stations. (More than one hairdresser. Plural.

One stylist
Two stylists. (Don’t say. ‘Two stylist’ . You are leaving out the ‘s’.

One stylist’s hair brush (we need the ‘s’. The ‘S’ is missing almost all the time. This is incorrect. Singular possessive)

Six stylists’ brushes ( Hairbrushes belonging to six stylists, — more than one stylist—. the ‘S’ is missing almost all the time. Plural possessive).

If we are not clear when we write about what we do, others might make the same mistake. This is no big deal, but I think it matters! B

Hmmm: I’m not an expert, but I think being paid $$ if you vote as someone directs you to, and if your vote added to the votes of millions of other citizens, creates the ‘to be the financially awarded ’ result, this
might not be legal. ????

And would identifying your vote, your name, not eliminate the privacy guaranteed to voters in an American election? Freedom to vote for a person we each trust and believe in, seems to be one of the powers of being an American.