Indigenous Legal Wins

The Waorani defeated Ecuador in court and protected half a million acres of the Amazon.

The case began with a government consultation conducted in Waorani communities in 2012 as Ecuador prepared to make Indigenous territories available for oil development.

But Waorani leaders said the process did not give their communities a genuine opportunity to understand or collectively decide what would happen to their land.

They described meetings held with insufficient notice, poor translation and confusing information. Traditional elders were largely excluded, while the environmental and cultural consequences of oil drilling were not adequately explained.

In 2019, the Waorani people of Pastaza sued the Ecuadorian government.

A three-judge panel found that the consultation had violated their constitutional rights to self-determination and free, prior and informed consultation.

The ruling voided the 2012 process and stopped Oil Block 22, covering roughly half a million acres (202,000 hectares) of Waorani rainforest, from being auctioned to oil companies.

Ecuador appealed. In July 2019, the Provincial Court of Pastaza rejected that appeal, making the victory final.

The decision did not create an unconditional ban on drilling forever. Instead, it prevented the government from using the flawed consultation to move forward. Any future proposal would require a new process that respects Waorani rights and decision-making.

The implications extended far beyond one territory. The same 2012 consultation had been used in plans involving 16 oil blocks covering more than 7 million acres (2.8 million hectares) of Indigenous land, giving other nations a powerful legal precedent.

A 2025 court review found that no current government project or administrative decision involved Block 22, although some reforms ordered after the case had been completed only partially.

Keeping this rainforest intact protects enormous stores of carbon, rivers, wildlife and the homeland of communities that have cared for it for generations.

Learn more:
“Waorani People Win Landmark Legal Victory Against Ecuadorian Government.” Amazon Frontlines.

On this International Day of the World's Indigenous Peoples, we invite you to listen.

What can a fisherman in the Amazon, a Samoan journalist, a Navajo archaeologist, and a hunter-gatherer from the heart of Africa teach us about the future of our planet?

In the latest episode of The UNESCO Courier podcast, their voices reveal how Indigenous knowledge, rooted in generations of observation, experience and close relationship with nature, is helping shape scientific research, protect biodiversity and rethink the way we care for our environment.

Travelling from the Brazilian Amazon to Samoa, via the African bushland and Sámi territory in Northern Europe, this sound journey explores the many ways Indigenous knowledge and science are coming together to address today's environmental challenges.

“The power of Indigenous knowledge”: https://smartlink.ausha.co/the-unesco-courier/the-power-of-indigenous-knowledge

A small tribe in Northern California is set to purchase nearly 40,000 acres of scenic, mountainous terrain near the Oregon border, in what would be the second largest “land back” deal in state history.

A tribe whose reservation covers fewer than 200 acres is about to become the steward of nearly 40,000.

Read more 👇

A wild stretch of the Mendocino Coast is going back to the people who called it home first.

Read more 👇

An Amazonian tribe just won in court against oil companies trying to access their ancestral territory. That sentence deserves to be read slowly because it describes something that does not happen often enough and that matters enormously when it does.
Indigenous communities in the Amazon have been fighting for their land for generations. The fights have taken different forms across different eras. Armed resistance. Political organizing. International advocacy. Community documentation of territory boundaries and cultural ties to land. And increasingly, legal battles fought through national and international court systems that have developed frameworks for recognizing indigenous land rights in ways that previous generations of law did not.
This court victory is a product of all of those efforts accumulated over time. It did not happen because a judge decided to be generous. It happened because a community built a legal case, found representation, navigated a court system that was not designed with them in mind, and won on the merits of a rights framework that recognized what oil company ambitions do not always choose to acknowledge. That this land is theirs. That it has been theirs. That the plants and rivers and soils and skies of a territory that an industry sees as a resource extraction opportunity are the living context of a culture and a people who were there first.
The Amazon is not an abstraction. It is the largest tropical rainforest on earth. It regulates rainfall patterns across an entire continent. It stores carbon at a scale that makes it one of the most critical climate stabilizers on the planet. It contains more biodiversity per square kilometer than virtually any other ecosystem. And it is home to dozens of indigenous communities who have lived within it for thousands of years and whose traditional practices of land stewardship are among the most effective conservation mechanisms that exist, more effective in many documented cases than formal protected areas managed by national governments.
When an indigenous tribe wins in court against an oil company in the Amazon the victory is not only for the people in the courtroom. It is for the forest. For the rainfall that the forest produces. For the carbon it stores. For the species that live nowhere else on earth. For the water systems that communities across South America depend on without necessarily knowing that the Amazon is why those systems exist.
This tribe organized. They built a case. They went to court. They won.
That is not a small thing. That is one of the most important things that can happen in the Amazon right now. And it happened because a community decided that their territory was worth fighting for through every available avenue including the legal ones.
They won. The forest is still standing. Both of those facts matter.

Wanting clean water is not terrorism. Poisoning it for profit is corporate rule.

When corporations have constitutional rights and money is treated as speech, polluters gain power while communities are criminalized for defending their water.

Pass the We the People Amendment. Sign the petition and volunteer at MoveToAmend.org.

The Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) remains one of the most significant federal laws affecting Native children and Tribal Nations. Enacted in 1978, the law was a response to decades in which large numbers of Native children were removed from their families and placed in non-Native homes, often losing important connections to their cultures, languages, and Tribal communities. In 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld ICWA in Haaland v. Brackeen, affirming Congress's authority to enact the law and preserving its role in helping keep Native children connected to their relatives and Tribal Nations whenever possible.

For many Indigenous communities, protecting family ties is closely connected to preserving language, traditions, identity, and the knowledge passed from one generation to the next. Tribal leaders across the country welcomed the Court's decision as an affirmation of Tribal sovereignty and an important step toward supporting the well-being of Native children. The ruling reinforces the importance of allowing Tribal Nations to play a central role in decisions affecting their youngest citizens, helping ensure that future generations remain connected to the communities, histories, and cultures that have shaped them for centuries.

A beloved stretch of California’s rugged coastline is headed back to Indigenous stewardship after a Gavin Newsom-backed state commission approved the transfer of a popular Mendocino County beach to three Indigenous tribes.