Lies on lies

There’s a growing issue on social media with so called “awareness pages” becoming monetized while still claiming they’re doing this purely for the cause. The minute an awareness creator offers paid subscriptions, ⭐️, gifts, subgroup access, or exclusive lives, that’s monetization even when it’s wrapped in “people asked for it” or “the familia wanted it.”

One big problem is the confusion around pricing and access. Some followers pay $2.99 a month thinking they’ll be able to watch subscriber lives, while others pay $9.99 a month for that same access. Then the $2.99 folks find out they actually can’t view the lives, which means people are paying without really getting what they thought they were signing up for.

If someone’s collecting two prices $2.99 and $9.99 then it should be clear from the start what each level includes 💸. People deserve to know before they pay, not after they realize they’re locked out of content they expected to see.

Another thing that doesn’t sit right is knowing a lot of supporters are on fixed incomes, struggling, or even close to homelessness, and still encouraging paid access just to watch someone go live. Even if people choose to subscribe, creators should really ask themselves whether charging vulnerable supporters just to “watch” matches what awareness is supposed to be about 🤔.

You also hear a lot of, “people asked for this,” or “the familia wanted it,” whenever monetized features pop up. But let’s be real nobody accidentally turns on monetization. That’s a choice the page owner makes, not the followers.

👉 What’s interesting is listening to someone say they didn’t really want people paying $9.99, but then still having the $9.99 option turned on and promoted anyway. If you truly didn’t want it, it wouldn’t be there. And notice how it’s always framed like someone else told them to do subs 🙄 as if monetization just magically happens without the creator clicking “enable.”

And subs aren’t even the only money stream. When someone has a showcase on their profile, uses a link in bio, and promotes things like a makeup line they earn commission from, that’s monetization too. There’s nothing wrong with making money but let’s not pretend it’s just awareness while collecting from subscriptions, commissions, links, and promotions at the same time.

Real awareness needs transparency 📌. If donations are part of the conversation, proof should be easy to show not “remember when,” not comment section reminders, but clear info so people understand where money actually goes.

Awareness shouldn’t depend on emotional loyalty or people sacrificing money they don’t really have. If a page is monetized, just say that. If it’s awareness, people shouldn’t have to pay to participate.

👉 And what’s kind of crazy is hearing someone talk about being monetized on one platform, while already planning new paid sub-groups on another, and still calling it awareness. Most real awareness pages aren’t focused on setting up the next subscription tier they’re focused on the cause ❤️. When the talk keeps circling back to subs, prices, links, and access, it starts to feel more like a business plan than awareness.

Support should never come at the cost of someone else’s stability.

Below are receipts showing how many paid subscribers there were at one point and that paid subscriptions are still active 📸

Listen to her lie again. This was just a few days ago while she was on another creator’s live with multiple creators present. When he questioned what that sound was, she immediately had to come up with an excuse.

First, she claimed it might have been a big duffel bag of baseball equipment with shoes in her back seat. Except we’ve already seen the video her back seat was clearly empty.

Then she switched it up and blamed the phone stand holder, even though we all watched her place the phone in the cup holder, not in any mount.

You see how this works? When one lie doesn’t stick, she reaches for another. The story keeps changing, but the facts don’t.

This isn’t a mistake. It’s a pattern lie, deflect, blame something else repeat. She refuses to take accountability, so instead she keeps piling lies on top of lies.

This is after the incident. Take a good look do you see anything in her back seat? Nope. Completely empty.

But of course… get ready for another lie. She’s about to invent a new excuse like clockwork.

She can’t just own up. Instead, it’s lie, get caught, lie again. The video doesn’t lie she does.

Here is the clip from the beginning until she gets home. The live comments will never show because the video was pulled from Rewatch. Anyone on TikTok knows Rewatch allows you to view past lives if the creator opted in.

What many people hear is that it sounds like she hit something. She is the one who said a dog ran into her car.

While watching the video, notice that she is clearly reading comments. This contradicts her claim that her chat was off and her phone was turned. You can also see her face peek out from behind the green screen multiple times.

You can also see that she puts her phone in the cup holder not a phone holder. This matters because she later tried to blame the noise on a phone holder, which doesn’t line up with what’s shown.

She went on another creator’s live saying the sound came from her phone holder or possibly from her son’s baseball gear in the back seat. However, her back seat appeared mostly empty, and we clearly see the phone is placed in her cup holder not phone holder.

❗️I’ve also posted an older video showing how Mama Lu looks down when her phone is in the cup holder.❗️

At the beginning of the video, you can clearly hear the sound of her car door opening. Later, when she claims she got out of the car, you never hear a door open again. In my opinion, she never exited the vehicle she only rolled down the window. While she’s whistling, you can still see her body peeking out behind the green screen.

She doesn’t know whether the dog ran off injured.

And let’s be real if this were anyone else, imagine how hard Mama Lu would be going after them. How many times she would be playing the video.

This video is from 10/01/2025, so she cannot say she “never did it again,” because she went live driving again on 10/22/2025 in a subscriber only live using a green screen. And it being old really excuse her actions ?

Too many inconsistencies.

It’s honestly amazing how Mama Lu tries to manipulate every situation instead of just admitting she was wrong.

She’s now running with the narrative that she wasn’t reading comments and that her chat was turned off. That’s false.

The reason the video I posted does not show comments is because it was pulled from an app called Rewatch. Anyone on TikTok knows you can download Rewatch and view old lives if the creator opted in. Videos pulled from Rewatch never show live comments, even though the original live absolutely had them.

So no the lack of comments in my clip does not mean comments were turned off.

Here’s the proof:
There’s another clip right before she went to get coffee and had the incident, where she is clearly reading the chat. Someone even told her to add a green screen and she responds to it. How do you read a comment if the comments are “off”?

She’s good at spinning narratives, but this one doesn’t hold up.

I’ve already posted a video showing how she repeatedly looks down at her phone while driving. The green screen later just covered it it didn’t change the behavior.

So let’s be clear:
• The video was not recorded live
• It was pulled from Rewatch
• Rewatch does not show comments
• Her claim that comments were off is a lie
• She was actively reading comments while driving

Birds of Feather… 🫢